http://blog.babeland.com/2007/08/02/regulating-the-porn-industry/ We’re a feisty, feminist bunch, and we like to talk about sex! Thu, 4 Dec 2008 06:30:26 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.1 http://blog.babeland.com/2007/08/02/regulating-the-porn-industry/#comment-119328 Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:02:45 +0000 http://blog.babeland.com/2007/08/02/regulating-the-porn-industry/#comment-119328 [...] 2257, a law required porn companies to spend most of their time recordkeeping to the detriment of making movies and doing photoshoots was ruled unconstitutional. I don’t know yet whether it’s only unconstitutional in the 6th circuit and when it goes into effect. If anyone has that information let me know. In the mean time, here’s a slightly lawyerly but very clear explanation of what happened with quotes from the justices’ opinions. If you need some background, check out my previous post on 2257. Also, thanks Fleshbot and Violet Blue for heralding the news so quickly. They both have great opinions on what the decision could mean. [...] […] 2257, a law required porn companies to spend most of their time recordkeeping to the detriment of making movies and doing photoshoots was ruled unconstitutional. I don’t know yet whether it’s only unconstitutional in the 6th circuit and when it goes into effect. If anyone has that information let me know. In the mean time, here’s a slightly lawyerly but very clear explanation of what happened with quotes from the justices’ opinions. If you need some background, check out my previous post on 2257. Also, thanks Fleshbot and Violet Blue for heralding the news so quickly. They both have great opinions on what the decision could mean. […]

]]>